(17). The Exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd.
Trích dẫn kiểu Chicago (xuất bản lần thứ 7)The Exercitation Answered, in the Assertions Following Made Good Against It. 1 That the Usurpation Pretended by the Exercitator Is Really No Usurpation, by Any Thing That He Hath Said to Prove It Such. 2 That Former Oaths in Controversie Oblige Not Against Obedience to Present Powers. 3 That Obedience Is Due to Powers in Possession, Though Unlawfully Enter'd. 17.
Trích dẫn kiểu MLA (xuất bản lần thứ 9)The Exercitation Answered, in the Assertions Following Made Good Against It. 1 That the Usurpation Pretended by the Exercitator Is Really No Usurpation, by Any Thing That He Hath Said to Prove It Such. 2 That Former Oaths in Controversie Oblige Not Against Obedience to Present Powers. 3 That Obedience Is Due to Powers in Possession, Though Unlawfully Enter'd. 17.